Monday, October 5, 2015

Religion as soft power in Malaysia


Religion is a broad term that is associated with different meanings depending on the person defining the word. It often plays an important role in shaping the identity of certain peoples and states. While religion can be the basis for morality, and positive actions, it can also be used to justify questionable actions or to control people. In certain states, religion has a lot of influence both culturally, economically, and politically. If presented correctly, religion has the ability to influence what a person wants through the hope of a more fulfilling life. Therefore, the use of religion can be considered an example of soft power.

An example of a state in which religion plays a very big role is Malaysia. Religion has a huge impact on the culture of the country as well as on its domestic policies, which in turn affect its international actions. One of Malaysia’s unique characteristics lies in the presence of multiple religions that are able to coexist peacefully side-by-side in this country.

After spending three months working in Malaysia, it was easy for me to see the impact that religion has in this country. In the street one sees women who are wearing saris walking beside women wearing the hajib; there are statues of Ganesh being sold next to Buddhist statues; and there are the Hindu temples, Christian churches, and Moslem mosques that are located within a couple of feet from each other. However, despite the co-existence of religions in Malaysia, Islam has the biggest influence both culturally and politically.  There are several examples of this, such as the significant number of words in the Malay vocab, whose origins can be traced back to the Arabic language, which is the chosen language of the Islamic religion. Another example is the amount of public holidays in Malaysia that are based on religion, the majority of which are Islam oriented.

These influences are also present on a political scale. In the Malay constitution, which states that all Malaysian citizens are equal, freedom of religion is an important component. However, Islamic dominance can be seen through the benefits that the Muslims tend to receive in the economy, in social life and in politics. Bumiputera (a term referring to the indigenous people of Malaysia) receive special treatment from the government such as affirmative action in University admissions, discounts when purchasing vehicles as well as real estate. The interesting part is that these indigenous people, for the most part are Muslims. In fact, in daily context, Muslim and Malay are used interchangeably. The constitution also states that Malays must be Muslim, otherwise they are legally not considered Malay. Furthermore, it is possible to obtain these privileges if one converts to Islam. This means that the clause in the constitution which entitles Bumiputera to certain rights, really applies to Muslims.  

While I was in Malaysia, I met many people of many different religions. Focusing on Muslims, I met some who were devote Muslims, attending mosque five times a day, always wearing the traditional clothing and so on. However, as with all religions I also met Muslims who were not quite so serious about the religion. For example, Allah deems it unlawful for a Muslim women to have a husband that does not practice Islam. Therefore, the man must convert to Islam before being able to marry the Muslim women. One of my good friend’s parents were in this situation, where her mother was Muslim and her father converted to Muslim in order for them to be able to marry. After talking with her more about this subject it became clear that her father was not a devote practitioner of Islam. She told me that he did not object to converting to Islam for two reasons, one, to be able to marry his wife and two because being considered a Muslim gave him certain benefits.

After experiencing Malaysian culture first hand, the influence that Islam has in that country is obvious. It is evident that the common perception of Malaysia as a multicultural country supporting the beliefs of multiple religions is not quite correct. The culture and domestic policies are shaped by Islamic influences. The economic promotion of Islam as well as the favorable treatment of the Bumiputra make the Muslim religion very attractive and can potentially influence personal religious decision about whether or not to practice Islam. Furthermore, it could influence a person’s decision of whether or not to convert out of Islam, for once a Muslim converts to another religion they no longer fall under the Bumiputera category. The Muslim community exhibits soft power because it promotes its religion through economic and political actions that provide desirable benefits to those who are of that religion which in turn makes that religion a very attractive option.

5 comments:

  1. Leah,
    First, a little confused, are you saying Malaysia is a pretty monolithic society? Or are you saying thats just how we interpret it from beyond its borders?
    It is really great how you connect personal experience into how religion can be used as soft power. I think it is really interesting how religious actors, without intent to have political influence, end up largely influence various polities around the world. I think it is very interesting how religion can have such a big impact without political or economic backing.

    In March, I traveled to Istanbul for 2 and a half weeks where I heard about religion as a form of soft power. This was just after Turkey announced that they would be funding the building of mosques as a form of diplomacy. This state-sponsored program has intentions of building mosques in various countries in efforts to prevent extremist groups from gaining power as well as widen Turkey's influence in the global sphere, especially for Muslims. This is a form of soft power because Turkey is hoping to act as model for Muslims around the world and they are basically using this as a campaign of religious diplomacy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maddie,

      Before visiting Malaysia, I read many books, travel guides and articles about Malaysia. What I found to be a common theme was that Malaysia, supposedly was a very multicultural, multiethnic country. The books talked about religions and cultures that coexisted peacefully and equally in extremely close proximity. After actually visiting the country, I was able to see that it was more complex then this, that the Malaysian government actually "favored" the Muslims and that many non-Muslims were not happy with this. This shows that the religions and cultures that exist there are not quite "equal" and also not as peaceful as was portrayed in the readings I did prior to my visit. Does that answer your question?

      That is very interesting, about Turkey. This also happens in Malaysia, as I talked about before, and I am sure, in many other countries in various forms.

      Delete
  2. This is very interesting. I had no clue that Malaysia's policies were so geared towards Islam, and I agree that soft power is definitely in play. To further your argument, Malaysia's use of soft power aids it's national security. By using a seductive rather than a coercive method to influence peoples' decisions, change is voluntary and therefore more effective for long term advancement. Something interesting to note about soft power is that it is only powerful when a state is legitimate, and this strength results from a state's societal system and history. As a result, soft power may be slow and take a long time. Therefore, soft power cannot be effective everywhere. Malaysia is a country that clearly has a long history with societal leaders that imbue respect in the citizens. Soft power is an effective method for Malaysian leaders to control the country.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Leah,
    I thoroughly enjoyed reading this and I think it is both a little surprising and very interesting! I keep thinking about your point that from an outsider's perspective Malaysia is very diverse religiously, when really there is strong favoritism and additional benefits (soft power) in being Muslim. I feel like part of this could be comparable to the United States with Christianity but not quite to the same extent-- especially with how both the Malaysian and U.S. constitutions include religious freedom. I feel like there's almost a more subtle version of this going on in the U.S., but more socially and not really involving anything legally.
    Something that is coming to mind is definitely the politicians we elect. Almost all of our politicians are Christian, and even more specifically, all of our presidents have been Protestant except for JFK who was Catholic. We have never even had a president who wasn't Christian.
    Obviously this isn't the same level of soft power that religion has in Malaysia, but I think there are definitely subtle parallels in the soft power religion has on the United States.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Victoria,

      You bring up an interesting point. Adding on to that, in my high school we would recite the Pledge of Allegiance every morning, as you may have as well. This pledge shows nationalism and our "dedication" to our country. However it is interesting to note that part of the pledge says "One nation, under God". By bringing God into a pledge that is said in many high schools around the nation and is known by almost every American, we can see the influences of religion as soft power.

      Delete